Seagit Forms vs Typeform
Seagit Forms is a free Typeform alternative for people who want the delivery plumbing without a paid plan. Both can ask one question per page; Typeform is the better-looking product and it is not close, because the motion and the craft are what you are paying for. What Seagit Forms offers instead is the same paging, plainly done, with responses that reach your systems at no cost.
At a glance
Only things that are stable and checkable. Anything that moves — prices, volume limits — is in the dated table below rather than stated here as though it were permanent.
| Seagit Forms | Typeform | |
|---|---|---|
| One question at a time | Yes, a layout setting | Yes, and it is their whole point |
| Animated transitions between questions | No — a progress bar, Back and Next | Yes, and it is what you pay for |
| Cost to collect responses | Free | See their pricing page |
| Send each submission to your endpoint | Yes — JSON webhook | Yes, on paid plans |
| Post submissions into Slack | Yes, on paid plans | Yes, via integrations |
| Post submissions into Discord | Yes, on paid plans | Check their integrations directory |
| Post submissions into Microsoft Teams | Yes, on paid plans — a Workflows webhook | Check their integrations directory |
| Post submissions into Google Chat | Yes, on paid plans | Check their integrations directory |
| Create an Airtable record per response | Yes, on paid plans | Check their integrations directory |
| Create a Notion page per response | Yes, on paid plans | Check their integrations directory |
| Append each response to Google Sheets | Yes, on paid plans | Yes, on their Basic plan and up |
| Embed that resizes itself | Yes — script loader | Yes |
| Restrict which sites may embed | Yes — frame-ancestors allow-list | Not exposed |
| Password-protect a form | Yes, on paid plans — scrypt-hashed | Yes, on paid plans |
| Logic jumps between questions | No | Yes |
Pricing: Seagit Forms vs Typeform
Typeform pricing below was read from their own pricing page on 2026-08-30. Prices change without notice, so treat this as a snapshot and check their page before deciding.
Seagit Forms
| Plan | Price | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 10 forms, 100 responses per form |
| Basic | $20/month | 100 forms, 2000 responses per form |
| Advanced | $40/month | 200 forms, 5000 responses per form, 3 seats |
Response limits are per form for the life of the form, not per month. Webhooks, Telegram delivery, embedding and CSV export are on the free plan; file uploads, password protection, email notifications, your own logo and connected apps (Slack, Discord, Teams, Google Chat, Airtable, Notion, Google Sheets) are on the paid plans.
All Seagit Forms plansTypeform
| Plan | Price | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 10 responses per month, account-wide |
| Basic | $39/month ($28 billed annually) | 100 responses per month |
| Plus | $79/month ($56 billed annually) | 1,000 responses per month |
| Business | $129/month ($91 billed annually) | 10,000 responses per month |
Typeform counts responses per month across the whole account and resets monthly. Seagit Forms counts them per form, for the life of the form — the two columns are not the same unit.
Typeform pricing pageOne price for the whole team: Basic is $20 a month flat, not per person.
Billed annually it is $200 a year — $16.67 a month, 17% less than paying monthly. Advanced is $40 a month, or $33.33 a month billed annually.
Basic covers 3 organizations of 2 seats each — 6 seats, which is up to 4 people once you count that you hold a seat in each organization you own. Advanced raises that to 15 seats across 5 organizations, up to 11 people.
Adding someone does not change the bill: the price is the plan, not the head count. Whether that beats a given rival depends on how they charge for seats — check their pricing page, which every comparison here links to, rather than a claim on this one.
When Typeform is the better choice
Every comparison should have this section. If it does not, you are reading an advert.
Presentation is the point
Both products can ask one question at a time, but Typeform’s is genuinely well made — the motion, the pacing, the typography. For a customer-facing survey where completion rate depends on how the form feels, that craft is worth paying for, and a progress bar with Back and Next will not match it.
You need branching logic
Typeform routes respondents down different paths depending on their answers. Seagit Forms shows every field to everyone. If your form has real branches, that is a hard requirement and Typeform meets it.
When Seagit Forms is the better choice
You want a webhook without paying for the privilege
Building forms, collecting responses, CSV export, webhooks and embedding are all on the free plan, and there is no upgrade prompt between a respondent and the submit button. One thing is not free: posting submissions to Slack. The free plan also caps volume at 10 forms holding 100 responses each.
You want control over where the form can be framed
An allow-list of domains is written into the embed page as a Content-Security-Policy frame-ancestors header, so the browser refuses to load the form anywhere you have not listed. Leave it empty and any site may embed it.
Moving from Typeform
Expect the form to feel different, deliberately
A Seagit form shows every question at once by default, which suits a short form and an internal one. If you want it paged, turn on “One question per page” in settings, or build the form with wizard steps to page by section instead. What you will not get is Typeform’s motion between questions — the paging is plain. If completion rate on a customer-facing survey is what you are optimising, test both before you commit.
Branching has to be flattened
Logic jumps do not exist here. A form that routes people down different paths has to become either one form showing every field, or several forms with their own links. For a screening flow that usually means asking the qualifying question first and sending people to a second form — cruder, and it works.
What to check before you switch
Whether any form depends on logic jumps, whether respondents ever upload files over 200 KB, and whether your integrations POST to an endpoint you control — a webhook moves across cleanly, a native integration into a third-party product does not.
Questions people ask
Is there a free Typeform alternative?
Yes, on the free plan: 10 forms at 100 responses each, including webhooks, embedding and CSV export. File uploads, password protection, your own logo and connected apps need Basic at $20 a month. It can also page one question at a time; what no plan reproduces is the motion between questions, which is the thing people usually pay Typeform for.
What does Typeform do that Seagit Forms does not?
The motion and polish of its conversational forms, and logic jumps that route respondents based on their answers. Paging itself is not a gap — Seagit Forms has a one-question-per-page setting — but the feel of it and the branching are. If either matters to your form, Typeform is the right tool and this page would rather tell you than sell you.
Can I move a Typeform to Seagit Forms?
There is no importer — you rebuild the fields, which for most forms is a few minutes of dragging. Responses already collected in Typeform stay there; export them to CSV from Typeform if you want a single archive alongside your Seagit exports.
What does it cost for a team?
Basic is $20 a month, or $200 a year — $16.67 a month, 17% less — and that one price covers 6 seats across 3 organizations, which is up to 4 people once you count the seat you hold in each one you own. Advanced is $40 a month, or $33.33 annually, for 15 seats and up to 11 people. Compare that against how the plan you are looking at counts users, which is on their pricing page.
Checked against the shipped product on 28 August 2026. The Seagit Forms limits quoted above — the five-second webhook timeout, the absence of retries, the 200 KB ceiling on a single file — are the values enforced in the code, not marketing rounding. Anything stated about Typeform is limited to behaviour they document publicly; their pricing is deliberately not quoted, because a figure correct today becomes a false claim on its own.